Bp Oil Spill

Television if full of advertizement and propaganda. As well as the internet with advertisement popups and clips on the sides of exclusively webpage. Propaganda is information set divulge by an constitution or government to promote and idea or cause. Many of these ar misleading and bias, arduous to make you regard in the identical things they do and convince you to participate in whatever cause they ar in. reckon ab come forward some of the commercials you seen on video such as refreshfuls reports, movies, policy- devising ads, and rec only in all ads.The virtually memorable to me atomic number 18 recall ads such as lawyers making announcements for medicines and compensation. As well as when pick while comes around and all of the runners ar chargeting their names fall out there. Also, every twenty-four hour period, watching the news on new crimes vent on in the cosmos and previews for my next favorite movie. Those are all different techniques of propaganda. T he purpose of me writing this demonstrate is to appearance you the propaganda in a unprejudiced informative commercial or news c inunct color. My of import focus depart be on the BP oil tumble.The first sociology conjecture I will compare with is symbolic interactionism. symbolical interactionism is the use of symbols or appear to face interaction. The counselling that this relates to the BP oil molt is the way that the owner of the company, Kenneth R. Fineburg, said that he was release to help and compensate the victims of the oil spill. Commercials and speeches were make about(predicate) his plans to pay back for the modify and loss of wages that his company had cause the gulf of Mexico and victims.The second theory will be functionalism. Functionalism is the relationship between parts of society. In this situation, the society came to nettleher and fought to be correct to get their lost wages back. Claiming they nurture mortgages, bills, car payments, and children to pay for and they halt non been operative in 8 months. Citizens of the affect area appeared on news cast and commercials were made explaining their situations, assay to reach out to some peerless that they needed help.The last theory is the conflict theory. Conflict theory instrument competition of scarce resources or the elite group control the poor and weak. This relates to this situation as the big man, Mr. Fineburg, having the bullion and resources to help the quite a little out with their lost wages. As, well his colleagues were trying to tell him that he was over compensating the victims. They had all of the control over whether or non the victims were going to be able to get paid and bailed out of this mess that one man was responsible for.In conclusion, propaganda was used in shipway to reach out to populate about the real problems going on in the gulf of Mexico during the time of the BP oil spill. I used the 3 main theories of sociology to compare how each of them relates to the oil spill. The rich over powering the poor, how society came in concert to get help, and the interaction between the people when the word needed to be put out. RESOURCE Schwartz, J. (2011, February 17). Gulf of Mexico Oil throw Blog. Retrieved from http//gulfofmexicooilspillblog. com/2011/02/17/gulf-of-mexico-oil-spill-blog-bp-propaganda/Bp Oil SpillBP anoint SPILL Under the Deepwater Horizon, an offshore burn down ring of British crude oil (BP) caused an oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. The accident occurred on April 20th 2010, where equipment failed and caused the explosion change posture the ring, and ca use the death of 11 workers and a great deal than 17 workers injured. The British based pushing company also faced early(a) problems at the site of the oil spill. to a greater extent than 40 million gallons (estimated data) of oil spewed into the Gulf of Mexico.Oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is a very serious threat for the wildlife as it causes water pollution. The oil spill comp allowe many coastal areas in the US, interchangeable the Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi and Florida. The oil spill tragedy strongly damaged wildlife cycle in the Gulf of Mexico, and many species were impel into extinction. Similarly, thousands of businesses were thrown into extinction. Many people has questioned the ethical decisions and mall value system that BP used to cut corners with the accident namely, the race to maximize moolah at all costs.We are all aware that one of the main causes that let to the disaster were the result of bad decisions, in which a less expensive natural selection (whether to run a test or use a particular chassis casing pipe, for example) would save lives. in that location has been range in dollars spent on research concerning how to traveling bag oil spills for off-shore utilisationing by BP scorn the companys NET profits above and beyond all salaries, bonuses, or overhead costs- of to a greater exten t than $59 BILLION (The Rachel Maddow Show on MSNBC, aired at 7 p. m.EST on June 28, Monday). The paperwork submitted to the U. S. Minerals Management Services (MMS) by BP in 2008 was 582 pages long, supposedly covering all of BPs trading operations in the Gulf of Mexico. However, they omitted their ability to dish out with oil spills in a worst- pillow outcome scenario full to get their permits for drilling. An separate very unethical act by BP was when President Obama was schedule to visit Louisiana back than, BP hurriedly hired temporary workers and handed out gear (paper haz-mat uniforms, etc. , still told these temps non to talk to anyone. As soon as all the TV cameras and the presidents motorcade left the area, these for show only hires immediately stopped working (a local government official took photos and try to question a few, who advised him they were not supposed to talk to anyone, on BPs ordinates). They did not come back on the quest day or any day thereafter.O n the zero dollars spent for developing back-up systems, BP advised The Rachel Maddow Shows representative that they rely on an organization which they claimed does spill research as yet though the investigators from the show discovered the organization named by BP does not receive any money from BP nor do they do research for ways to stop oil spills. In other words, BP was unethical and lied again. This British Petroleum is listed as the fourth wealthiest corporation in the entire world, and yet they lie about the extent of their spill.They fudged figures and information (against the law) in order to get a license to drill in American waters, they did not even bother to change the batteries for the system they claimed was their back-up. BP, as most oil companies (and other business), are aimed at making as much money as possible. In this case because of the big cover up the media did, BP was obligate to fix the problem, and it is a problem that its cost them major money, both th rough not bad(p) up and lost product. BP has so utmost committed $42 billion to alter up.I really hope that BP (and other companies) wise(p) the lesson, that chemise corners and cost reduction is not the only point that organizations should focus on. It is not safe to cut corners and presume that things will not happen. Make ethical decision, have back up plans, and worst case scenario preparation. If BP would be more ethical and do the right things either by using the latest safety precautions when drilling (not cutting corners, and reducing costs), and moving faster and more dynamically when the disaster occurred, they could have avoided billions in cleanup and damages that they faced and are still facing now.The BP oil spill has offered a moment for reflection for leaders around the world about their most basic beliefs. To many people, the BP oil spill has brought home the idea that future corporeal leaders must develop individual(prenominal) ethical standards for making d ecisions that go beyond just a financial calculation. There are plenty of business practices that are legal, but fall short in being ethical. But I believe being ethical does pay off, behind and steadily. You may lose some opportunities, but your reputation and self-perception is invaluable.